YES! I want to learn more about property investments.

Property Accountants In Hamilton Blog

Is Success Actually Failure?

4 November 2019

 

Is Success Actually Failure?

 

  

 

 

 

What is success?  Here is a common story of perceived success, with a reality check.  This blog was originally written in March 2018 but is still extremely relevant.
 
Tim and Jess are both 28, and buy a house for $350,000 in 2003, with a $250,000 loan.  Times are tough, so they only pay interest only, and cash flow is tight to start with.  Tim and Jess slowly earn more, but they also spend more.  They split the loan into $200,000 fixed interest only and $50,000 revolving credit that they can pay off quickly with their extra earnings.
 
Times get tough again, and the bank allows Tim and Jess a little mortgage holiday for six months, to help them get back on track.
 
Over time, the property slowly goes up in value.  The property market booms and suddenly it is worth $600,000 in 2007.  Tim and Jess find that their revolving credit is at $49,500 and hasn’t really moved over the four years.  They now owe $260,000 on their house (as the mortgage holiday got added on).  But their cars are getting older, the house needs some repairs, they would love a big TV and they haven’t had a holiday in years!  Suddenly, with the extra equity, the bank will allow Tim and Jess to borrow $50,000 more.  The mortgage is only $310,000 or 52% LVR.
 
Tim and Jess have it great - a holiday, new car, the big TV, but still struggle with cash flow over the years, so manage on interest only lending.  But now they want a bigger and better house.  In 2012, the Auckland house market has moved up a little more, so their house is now worth $750,000 (41% LVR!).  They borrow $30,000 to make the house look better and do the repairs they should have done back in 2007.  They buy a new house for $1,000,000.  After commission, they get $720,000 sale of their old house, and after paying off the mortgage of $340,000, have $380,000 cash left.  So, over time, their $100,000 deposit has turned into $380,000.  Awesome?
 
The new house really needs some new furniture, so Tim and Jess borrow an extra $50,000 for some new furniture and a spa.  They have a $1,000,000 house in Auckland now with a $670,000 (67% LVR).  They are earning more money than ever.
 
The cycle starts again, they are earning more but also spending more.  They need a new car, some house repairs, a swimming pool and they haven’t had a holiday in ages.  Plus, they have some HP’s, a personal loan and their credit cards are maxed out.  The property market has jumped further and the house is now worth $1,400,000 in 2014.  Wow!  With only a $670,000 mortgage or a 48% LVR.  The bank allows Tim and Jess to borrow another $150,000, leaving them with a $820,000 mortgage or 59% LVR.
 
Tim and Jess are now (2014) both 39 and have $580,000 equity in their home.  Would you say Tim and Jess are successful?
 
In my opinion – NO
 
To pay off their original loan over 30 years would be monthly payments of $1,342.  So paid off in 2033.
 
Now, to pay off their new loan over say 20 years, the monthly payments would be $5,412 or $65,000 per year, just in the loan payments!  And this would have a loan repaid in 2034.
 

My long term goals for all property investors are:

  • Have a debt free personal house
  • Plus passive income.


Tim and Jess are going to struggle to pay off their personal house.  They could try to downsize slightly, but if they wish to stay in Auckland, it is still likely to cost them over $1 million to buy another house, still leaving them with around a $500,000 loan.  Tim and Jess are a long way off a debt free personal house, and have no passive income.  Currently, at retirement, they are looking like they would still be in debt and relying on the Government pension.  Or forced to move to Taumarunui!


What does this highlight?

  1. ​A lot of so-called successful people are not good with money!  I would say that over 95% of people are not good with money!
  2. An increased personal house value doesn't make you successful.  Having a fancy car, pool, etc., also doesn't make you successful.
  3. Make principal repayments on your personal house.  Try to pay off your personal house as quick as possible.  Talk to firms like NZ Home Loans who focus on trying to pay off your personal house loan quicker.
  4. Don't borrow extra for new cars, furniture, etc.  -   You should be saving for these items and paying for them from surpluses of your income over expenses, not from capital gains on your house.
  5. Establish a plan to gain passive income long term.


I hope this has given you a different perspective to think about.


Kind regards
Ross Barnett 

What would happen if you sold half of your property portfolio?

24 October 2019

 

What would happen if you sold half of your property portfolio?

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

If you have a large residential rental property portfolio of five or more rentals, what would happen if you sold half over the next few months?

Seriously think about what would happen:
 

  • Your debt would decrease.  How does this fit with your risk profile long term?
  • Your passive income and cashflow is likely to get a lot better.  Would this meet your long term goals?
  • How much less stress and hassle would there be if you sold half your rentals?

 

Everyone has different aims and goals.  In general, your aim should be to have a debt free personal house and passive income.  The value of your personal house and the level of passive income depends on you and what you want/need.
 


Case Study
 
Joe has:

  • Personal house worth $1m, with $300,000 debt remaining, owned by a Trust.

 

  • Joe has an LTC with 10 Rentals. The LTC is owned by a Trust.
  • The 10 properties are worth $500,000 each, with $220,000 debt.
  • Or overall $5m rental assets with $2.2m debt.
  • Each rental is making around $5,000 per year before tax, and after tax (with some chattels depreciation) is left with $4,200.
  • Over 10 rentals this is $42,000 passive income per year.

 

  • Joe is currently working, making $120,000 per annum.  After tax, this is $90,000 approximately.  $20,000 of this currently goes to his personal home P&I payment, leaving $70,000 that Joe currently lives on, and ideally he wants to keep this level of spending.

 

If Joe sold 5 rentals, the older rentals that require more repairs and more work in general:

  • In simple terms receive $2.5m.
  • Repay personal house debt.
  • Repay all LTC debt.
  • Left with 5 rentals, worth $500,000 or $2.5m overall and no debt.
  • Each rental would now be making around  $15,000 per year before tax, or $75,000.
  • After tax, this would be $60,000 left for Joe to spend.

 
 
While this case study doesn’t give Joe his ideal amount of income left after tax, it isn’t far away! 

Joe:

  1. No longer has to work (I included property management expenses in the rentals).
  2. Earns $60k after tax, compared to current $70,000.
  3. Long term, I would work towards holding newer properties that attract better tenants, have less repairs and overall are less hassle.  If this is done, then Joe will also have less hassle.


Joe might be able to renovate properties slightly to improve rent, or add a minor dwelling or two, or do other simple things to get the extra income, or he might be close to 65 years old and receive the pension.
 
 
I hope that whatever position you are in, you work through how this would work for you.  There are lots of property investors who can do this now, and achieve the outcome that they want!  It is all about the outcome that is right for you.  Some property investors want more and more and more.  Others are happy just with a reasonable passive income and being able to retire early with no debt and no hassle.  There isn't a right or wrong way!
 
 
As always, make sure you get expert advice before selling any properties, to ensure there are no tax implications! 

Kind regards
Ross Barnett

Maximise What You Already Have

11 October 2019

 

Maximise What You Already Have

 

 

 

 

 

 

Rather than trying to buy another property, have you considered maximising what you already have?

What opportunities do you already have within your personal house or rental property portfolio?

Often, property investors are starting to look in less desirable areas and at less desirable properties in an attempt to get a reasonable return.  In my opinion, a lot of these are not great investments long term, and often it is a fear of missing out that is driving the purchase.


Here are some areas you can look at, instead of forcing another purchase:

1)  Simple renovation of existing rentals

Often the easiest way to improve rent is to renovate a property. I would typically look for and expect well over a 10% return on investment. That means if you spend $20,000, you want at least $2,000 per year in extra rent, or an extra $40 per week approximately as a minimum.

A great idea is to talk to your property manager:

  • "How much would rent go up if I add a heat pump?"  (Note: Make sure you understand Healthy Homes requirements before doing this!)
  • "What things should I do to the property that would most increase the rent?"


If you do a really smart renovation, you might get closer to 20% return on investment, which is fantastic.

The cashflow from a renovation can be great long term.  You might borrow $20,000 at 3.5% interest, costing $700 per year.  If you make $2,000 per year in extra rent, that gives you an overall increase in cashflow of $1,300 per year.



2)  Can you add bedrooms to existing rentals?

If you have a 1 to 3 bedroom property, I would look at options to increase the number of bedrooms:

  • Is there a second lounge that can become a bedroom?
  • Can the garage be converted into a bedroom?
  • Can a room get split in two to create an extra bedroom?


It is very important to make sure any renovations like these are done legally!

Often, adding a bedroom will add equity as well as cashflow.



3)  Can you rent part of your personal house to a flatmate, boarder or Airbnb?

I have done previous blogs on boarding rules, but the main difference is:

  • Boarders are more than just a room and requires regular meals.  If the income is under the threshold, the income does not need to be returned for tax (no tax).
  • Flatmate or Airbnb income is taxable.



Any of the above three options can be a great way to bring in extra income with little cost.



4)  Can you put minor dwellings on the back or front of any of your rentals?  Or subdivide and build another rental? Or subdivide and build a duplex?

Minor dwellings are generally good for cashflow but not so good for equity.  You also need to consider what would happen if you have to sell.  Who will you be selling to? First home buyers or home buyers don't normally want two houses. That leaves large families or investors, which could make selling hard or reduce your value.

A smart subdivision or duplex should be good for both cashflow and equity. Be careful if you have to sell, as often if you subdivide and sell, the gains are taxable.



5) This one is often overlooked - What can you do with your personal home?

Can you add a minor dwelling or subdivide or build a duplex? For subdivisions, there are some great exemptions that can be utilised for tax purposes!



I hope after reading this, you will consider what opportunities exist within your current rental properties, which will hopefully improve your cashflow and equity as a result!


Kind regards
Ross Barnett

Ring Fencing Basics and Eleven Examples

6 December 2019

As many of you will know, Ring Fencing comes in from 1/4/19. This basically means that you cannot offset residential property losses against other income.

What does this really mean for a lot of property investors? If for the year ending 31/3/19, you had a rental property in your personal name or in an LTC where you own the shares. It incurred a loss for tax purposes of $20,000, the loss would have offset your personal income from salary or wage. And, if your income was over $70,000, you should have received a tax refund of approximately $3,300. FROM THE 1/4/19, OR FOR THE 31/3/20 FINANCIAL YEAR, IF YOU MAKE THE SAME LOSS IN THE SAME WAY, THERE WILL BE NO TAX REFUND.

So when can you use the losses?

  • Either they will carry forward, year after year, until you have some profits from residential rental properties,
  • Or, if you have multiple residential rental properties, you might be able to offset the profit from one rental, against a loss from another. If you have these rentals in different structures, it is important that you understand and check that you can offset a profit against a loss.




Eleven Examples, all from 1/4/19 or for the 31/3/20 financial year or later;

1. You have two residential rental properties in an LTC. One makes a $15,000 profit, one incurs a $10,000 loss. If you use the portfolio method (default method) for Ring Fencing, you could offset the loss against the profit, and just pay tax on the $5,000 overall profit. SUCCESSFUL OFFSET.

So if we have properties in one entity, we can offset? Not necessarily!


2. You have one commercial property in an LTC, making a profit of $15,000, and one residential rental property in the same LTC incurring a $10,000 loss. Can't offset, as commercial properties are not included in the rules. So, you can't offset the residential loss against the commercial property. There might be ways to improve this, so well worth a chat with Ross! FAILED, CAN'T OFFSET. Would pay tax on full $15,000, and $10,000 loss would carry forward.


3. Similar as point 2, but Holiday Home with some private use and some rental, making a $15,000 profit and in the same LTC residential rental property incurring $10,000 loss. Can't offset as Mixed Use properties are not included in the rules. So can't offset the residential loss against the mixed use/holiday home profit. There may be ways to improve this, so well worth a chat with Ross! FAILED, CAN'T OFFSET. Would pay tax on full $15,000, and $10,000 loss would carry forward.


4. Two entities? An LTC owns a residential rental, incurs a $10,000 loss. Joe owns all the shares in the LTC, and also owns a residential rental in his personal name that makes a $20,000 profit. We can offset, so would just pay tax on the $10,000 overall profit. SUCCESSFUL OFFSET.



So all entities can offset? NO.


5. A Trust owns a residential rental and incurs a $10,000 loss. One of the beneficiaries, Jane, owns a residential rental in her personal name that makes a $20,000 profit. We can't offset, and under the old rules we couldn't offset either as a Trust cannot distribute a loss to beneficiaries. There may be ways to improve this, so well worth a chat with Ross! FAILED, CAN'T OFFSET. Would pay tax on full $20,000, and $10,000 loss would carry forward.


6. A Normal Company or QC (not an LTC) owns a residential rental and incurs a $10,000 loss. One of the shareholders, Bob, owns a residential rental in his personal name that makes a $20,000 profit. We can't offset, and under the old rules we couldn't offset either as a Normal Company cannot pass losses onto shareholders. There may be ways to improve this, so well worth a chat with Ross! FAILED, CAN'T OFFSET. Would pay tax on full $20,000, and $20,000 loss would carry forward.



More complicated examples:


7. LTC owned by Sally, incurs $7,500 loss. Trust where Sally is a Beneficiary achieves a $12,500 profit. If the Trust retained the profit, we couldn't offset. If the Trust allocated the $7,500 or more of the rental income to Sally, Sally could then offset this against the LTC loss. So, overall just pay tax on the $5,000 overall profit. SUCCESSFUL OFFSET.


IF YOU HAVE AN LTC WITH RENTALS AND YOU ALREADY HAVE A TRUST, WHY NOT HAVE THE LTC OWNED BY THE TRUST? Gives asset protection and more flexibility with allocating profits to beneficiaries and can potentially save tax. In the past, the losses were stuck in the Trust. But now with Ring Fencing, they will be Ring Fenced anyway, so makes sense to look at your Trust owning your LTC shares.
Note: Make sure you get expert advice before doing any share transfers as you can end up with a taxable gain from Brightline rules or have other tax consequences!


8. Sue has flatmates in her personal house and achieves a profit of $3,000. An LTC in which Sue owns all the shares, has a $2,500 loss from residential rental. We can't offset as personal home is excluded from Ring Fencing rules. So, Sue would have to pay tax on the $3,000 flatmate income, and the $2,500 residential loss would be Ring Fenced and carry forward to next year. FAILED, CAN'T OFFSET.


9. Overseas property? Alan owns a residential rental in Australia that incurs a $5,000 loss. This needs to be returned in New Zealand, in New Zealand dollars, and following NZ tax rules (watch depreciation especially). Alan only has income from Salary and Wages in New Zealand. The loss would be Ring Fenced, and the loss would carry forward.


10. Three Airbnb properties (not personal home or mixed use) rented for short term accommodation in an LTC, making a $30,000 profit. Fiona owns all the shares in LTC and also owns three residential rental properties in her personal name, incurring an $18,000 loss. IRD's response to this query was that the three Airbnb properties were excluded from Ring Fencing rules as business, therefore could not offset. I think there will be further debate on this concept and many tax experts have different opinions! SO, FOR NOW, BE VERY CAREFUL ABOUT SHORT TERM ACCOMMODATION OFFSETTING RESIDENTIAL RENTAL LOSSES. If you are in this situation, I would suggest a catch up with me, as it will be very fact dependent!


11. Profit from trading properties can offset losses from residential rental properties, but it is not that straightforward:

a) If trading and holding in same entity (never do this in practice as there will be other issues), then could offset profit against loss. SUCCESSFUL OFFSET.

b) If Jake trades through a normal company and makes a $60,000 profit and pays himself a shareholder salary of $60,000. If Jake also has a residential rental in his personal name, incurring a $10,000 loss. We can't offset and Jake would still pay tax on the $60,000 shareholder salary. FAILED, CAN'T OFFSET.

c) Two LTC's - one with $60,000 trading profit, one with $10,000 residential loss. If the LTC's are both owned by the same Trust (for example), then the Trust could offset the two and just pay tax on the $50,000 overall profit. SUCCESSFUL OFFSET.



IN GENERAL - If you are using Normal Companies, it would be worth meeting with me, as there is most likely a better way to structure, can reduce tax, can give asset protection long term and can make it a lot easier to get capital gains out!
For more details about having a Property Advisory Meeting with me and/or to book a meeting, click here.

Make sure you also check out my other blogs on Ring Fencing:

- Ring Fencing Options

- Ring Fencing - Obtained Royal Assent 26/6/19

- Recent Changes and Updates, including Ring Fencing

- Ring Fencing and Special Tax Codes



I hope you have found this information useful. If you are concerned about Ring Fencing, it is best to book an appointment with me to ensure you are still set up in the best way.


For existing Coombe Smith clients, we are likely to only need 30 mins or less, so the cost for structure advice will be less. If you only have one entity, you can book a free 5-10 minute telephone chat with me to quickly go over this. We also have discounted meetings for Coombe Smith clients after your Annual Financial Statements have been completed (unless you have already used this).

Kind regards
Ross Barnett

Which is better? 8% Gross Yield or 5.5%

30 September 2019

 

Which is better? 8% Gross Yield or 5.5%

 

It might sound like a really silly question, but which is better?
 
 

Higher Yield – Tokoroa Property, 8% Gross Yield

First property I could find in Tokoroa on Realestate.co.nz was 176 Balmoral Drive.

 



 

 

  

  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

On the market for $229,000.
Currently tenanted $280 pw.
 
That’s a 6% yield based on 50 weeks sad.  But say you could wave your magic wand, and buy it for $175,000.  Now that’s an 8% Gross Yield!
 
Would you buy it?
 
The full figures are below, but it loses $2,402.50 per year!  Would you still buy it?
 



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



 

 

 

Lower Yield – Hamilton Property, 5.5% Gross Yield  

 
First property I could find in Hamilton on Realestate.co.nz was 3/60 Wellington st.
 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



 

 

 

 

On the market for $619,000.
Currently tenanted $660 pw.
 
That’s a 5.5% yield based on 52 weeks.
 
Would you buy it?
 
The full figures are below, but it makes $3,463.40 positive cashflow per year! 

 



 
 
 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

OVERALL GROSS YIELD AND LOCATION
 
Gross Yield is a great tool for comparing properties in the same location.  But be careful with different locations.  If one location has low rent, a high Gross yield property can still be negative cashflow!
 
So make sure you work out and review the full cashflow for any investment you are looking to buy!
 
 
In this example, the cashflow on the 5.5% newer property in Hamilton is a lot better than the 8% older property in Tokoroa.
 
 
NOTE – this doesn’t mean I would buy either!
 
 
I hope you have found this useful
 
Kind regards
Ross Barnett

 
 
 
 

Contact Us

For further enquiries or to arrange a free 10-minute no-obligation phone consultation about
your situation and what Coombe Smith can do for you, please email, phone or fill out our contact form. 

We'd love to hear from you!