IRD recently put out PUB00260, INCOME TAX - Land Acquired for a Purpose or with an Intention of Disposal
4 March 2016
IRD recently put out PUB 00260 , INCOME TAX – LAND ACQUIRED FOR A PURPOSE OR WITH AN INTENTION OF DISPOSAL.
The whole document is available on the IRD website under Public consultation, or at http://www.ird.govt.nz/public-consultation/
Example 5 is quite interesting and worth a read if you are a long term hold investor. The key part is to be very specific with your intention and not to have a set sale time!
Example 5 – More than one purpose or intention
54. Chris purchased a property in August 2012. The property was marketed as being an attractive investment – ideal as a rental property, and expected to have “great annual capital growth”. Chris decided to buy the property to rent it out for three to five years, by which stage he hoped to be able to realise a capital gain on the property. Chris has paid tax on the rental income. He sold the property in October 2015 for a sizeable profit.
55. The 2-year “bright-line” rule does not apply to the sale of the property, because it was acquired before 1 October 2015. Even if the property had been acquired on or after 1 October 2015, the 2-year “bright-line” rule would not apply because the property was not sold within two years of being acquired. Therefore, in those circumstances it would still be necessary to consider s CB 6.
56. An amount that a person derives on the disposal of land will be income under s CB 6 if they acquired the land for a purpose or with an intention of disposing of it. A purpose or intention of disposing of the land does not need to be the only purpose or intention the person had when they acquired the land. It also does not need to be their dominant or main purpose or intention. It is enough if disposal is one of their purposes or intentions.
57. Chris was attracted to invest in the property in question because it was expected to have great annual capital growth, and could be rented out in the meantime. He purchased the property with the purpose of renting it out in the short-medium term and then selling it to realise the expected capital gain.
58. It does not matter that Chris acquired the property for more than one purpose, and disposal was only one of those purposes. When he acquired the property, Chris had a firm purpose of disposing of it in three to five years to hopefully make a capital gain.
59. Neither the residential exclusion (s CB 16) nor the business exclusion (s CB 19) apply in respect of the property, because Chris did not live in it or carry on a business from it.
60. The proceeds on the sale of the property are therefore income to Chris under s CB 6.
61. It is not relevant that the rental income was subject to tax – the Act taxes rental income as well as the proceeds on the sale of the property.
62. Chris can get a deduction against the sale proceeds for the amount he paid to acquire the property and for any capital improvements he made to the property. In each year he owned the property he will also have been allowed to deduct the interest on the money he borrowed to purchase the property, the cost of insurance on the property, and the cost of any repairs and maintenance on the property that were not capital in nature.
Kind regards
Ross Barnett
Branch Manager
Coombe Smith Chartered Accountants
Hamilton Branch
Normal Office Hours: Monday - Friday, 8am - 4pm
Phone: (07) 839 2801
Fax: (07) 839 2802
Level 1, 851 Victoria St,
PO Box 9317, Hamilton 3240
www.cswaikato.co.nz
This may be a 'Tax Advice Document' subject to non-disclosure rights under the Tax Administration Act 1994. You should not disclose the contents to any party without first obtaining professional advice. Disclosure may void the non-disclosure right. This electronic mail message together with any attachments is confidential. If you are not the intended recipient please email us immediately and destroy the email. You may not copy, disclose or use the contents in any way. The contents and attachments, may contain views or opinions that are those of the sender and not necessarily the views or opinions of Coombe Smith Hamilton LP. Coombe Smith Hamilton LP accepts no responsibility for changes made to this e-mail or to any attachments after transmission from Coombe Smith Hamilton LP. Thank you.



